Pro-Palestine activists take to the streets despite trial and intimidation

Last night, I marched with hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists taking to the streets of Melbourne and marching to Max Brenner as part of the Boycott, Disinvestment and Sanctions campaign against the apartheid state of Israel. These demonstrations continue despite attempts to persecute and intimidate the demonstrations and leading activists.

It was important to march last night on the week of the Nakba, the day Palestinians were evicted from their land, and in light of the inspiring stand Palestinian prisoners have been taking by going on hunger strike to draw attention to their unjust detention.

With the demo taking place in the middle of the trial of 16 activists who were arrested last year at a similar protest, police spared no expense. Hundreds of police swarmed the city, with a crack team of riot police following the peaceful march as it made its way through the city to Max Brenner in QV. At times, the march was flanked by a tight line of police on either side. It was a clear sign of intimidation as if those opposing Israel’s war crimes were the threat, not Israel itself. Many who would have come up and joined us kept their distance because of the heavy police presence. It is revolting that they do anything they can to try and dissuade people from exercising their right to protest. But it was inspiring that hundreds came out despite this and defied the intimidation.

The trial continues in the Melbourne Magistrates Court and defendants say that the police are trying to drag the trial out for as much as possible, putting a ridiculous amount of resources into the case. Already it has been revealed in the case that police were briefed before last year’s protest with specific intent to make arrests to send a message. QV management met with Zionist groups and the Victorian police to coordinate efforts to stop any criticism of Israel, and especially companies or the Australian governments ties with the state.

Defend the Boycott Israel 19 and the right to protest

For those that don’t know, a BDS (Boycott, Disinvestment and Sanctions) protest outside Max Brenner last Friday night was attacked by the Victorian police where 19 people, including myself, were arrested. It was basically an attempt, pushed by Ballieu and the Zionists to break up a peaceful demonstration and squash any criticism of Israel and any threat to Max Brenner’s flow of profits on a busy Friday night.

DSC_0433

Even if you don’t support the particular campaign, it’s important to come out and defend the right to protest in Victoria, especially given other protests such as those against mandatory detention, have been subject to increased police intervention in the last few months.

We targeted Max Brenner because of its role backing and defending some of the most brutal sections of the Israeli army. The Strauss Group, the company that owns Max Brenner sends care packages to the Golani Brigade of the IDF known for their role Operation Cast Lead that saw over 1,500 Palestinian civilians killed and their role in the 2002 massacre of the Jenin refugee camp.

Ted Lapkin, supporter of freedom around the world (to murder Arabs in cold blood) launched a pretty stereotypical attack on the protest, congratulating the role of the police. It seems Lapkin, whilst missing the fact that it was the Victorian Police that was blocking the entrance to Max Brenner, thinks it’s more important to have the ‘freedom’ to make money to support genocide than it is to have the right to protest against such corporations.

This is amongst the usual racist attacks on Arabs and Muslims who we stand with side by side with such doozies as “There were radical feminists protesting on behalf of an Islamic radical regime that would slap them into a burka so fast it would make their head swim.” It wouldn’t surprise me if Lapkin supported the ‘freedom’ to rip a headscarf off a Muslim woman like one of the police attempted to on Friday night.

These kinds of shallow attacks on our protest highlight the fact that Zionists like Lapkin cannot account for the brutal actions of the Israeli state in the face of increasing opposition. They are becoming increasingly isolated since the war on Gaza in 2009 and the attack on the first Flotilla last year.

The BDS movement is gaining support alongside other actions such as the second Flotilla and I suspect that the police trying to clamp down on our right to protest is not going to intimidate us and scare us away like they intend to, but just make us more determined and gain the support of people in the broader community that want to defend the right to protest in Victoria.

Organisations or individuals can sign-on to a statement in support of the ‘Boycott Israel 19′ and the right to protest in Victoria at BoycottIsrael19.wordpress.com

Melbourne protests again against Israel's murder of peace activists

Yesterday, thousands took to the streets again to oppose Israel’s war crimes following the murder of peace activists aboard aid ships heading to break the siege of Gaza. The demonstration was to oppose these murders but also the general treatment of Palestinian people that are murdered everyday, particularly as a result of the the siege which has prevented Gaza City from rebuilding since the war in 2009.

Once again it was angry and loud, ending outside State Parliament with the crowd chanting “Israel! Terrorist!”

Of course, the issue is ongoing and there is probably going to be another demonstration this week. This is especially critical given that a second ship was boarded yesterday, the Rachel Corrie, named after the America solidarity activist that was run over by an Israeli bulldozer whilst he tried to protect a Palestinian home from demolition.

P6050380

P6050384

P6050395

Thousands Protest Against Israel's Crimes

I left work at 5pm tonight to run down to the Bourke Street Mall to join a protest against Israel’s latest act of murder and piracy against a flotilla of peace activists who tried to bring aid to the starving people of Gaza.

The crowd was packed tight and the mood was buzzing and angry and loud. People were obviously shocked and fired up at the latest attacks and it was expressed through the chanting and shouting in the crowd as people gave speeches. The crowd was also full with Turkish flags in response to many of the activist aboard being Turkish. A union activist compared the recent attacks and people condemning Israel with the attacks in 1998 against the Wharfies and how the tide turned against Howard’s demonisation of unionists on the docks.

Another rally has been called this Saturday, 2pm at the State Library in Melbourne and there will probably be rallies in other major cities in Australia as well as all around the world as Israel continues to commit crimes again and again, so we need to come out again and again. The tide is turned against the apartheid state and their crimes.

P6010377

P6010393

P6010408

Israel's image, the media and Western leaders

Looking the media coverage surrounding Israel’s recent attack on an unarmed flotilla of boats trying to bring aid to Gaza, I wasn’t surprised by the pro-Israel bias. Also, the shaping of the incident around Israel’s PR image is interesting as well as the reaction from Western governments.

Of the media reports I’ve seen coming from mainstream sources, there is of course a large proportion of space given over the Israel to defend itself and muddy the waters in what should be a clear-cut breach of international law and what really amounts to piracy. News presenters and journalists have given numerous quotes to Israeli officials throwing around conflicting excuses and stories surrounding the attack.

Some say they did it because either al-Qaeda or Hamas were connected to the boats, others say it was an act of self-defence with a few conflicting lies as to how this happened from the activists having weapons to activists stealing a gun from an Israeli soldier.

The fact that an attacking raid on unarmed activists can be portrayed as an act of self-defence and the idea of the activists defending themselves is never explored is deeply contradictory. But it is not out-of-character for the media to give space to these ideas given Israel and the media’s collusion to shape to events of 2009 as Israel, armed to the teeth with US military aid, as the victim, and the Palestinians, with a few rockets and rocks, as the aggressor.

I have not seen one person from the side of the flotilla interviewed. I haven’t seen every media report so I’m open to someone telling me that have. But I haven’t even seen a pro-Palestinian source.

This isn’t a surprise to me. The bias in the media around many questions, not just Israel-Palestine, has been evident for a long time. But it’s worth pointing out. They’re trying to find anything to defend the apartheid state no matter how obvious it is to every rational person that nothing can defend these actions.

The media seem to try to frame it around how it affects Israel’s PR image – not around how it affects the lives of Palestinians or the activists involved. They think it looks bad for them to be taking rash actions and it would be better for Israel if they weren’t so obviously murderous and just did it in quiet.

Similarly, Western leaders have feigned concern and condemnation but behind the façade, they still support the state’s right to exist and the rationale for their crimes. They are condemning Israel’s actions because of this obsession with image. The US in particular are trying to look like there’s some bullshit peace process going on and Israel’s actions bring this into question and make the US’s credibility as some neutral mediator look like a joke.

They’re also forced to condemn the actions or at least consider being concerned for both sides because of the mounting opposition to Israel and its crimes. This is a victory and the thousands of ordinary people out on the streets around the world since Gaza 2009 and as I write this today brought up this shift where Israel’s image is on the back foot.

But we must not stay complacent. We must keep fighting.

Photos from the action at 4.30 in Bourke Street Mall, Melbourne are to come tonight.

Linkshout: Oppose Israel's attack on the pro-Palestinian flotilla

LinkshoutIf you’ve been living under a rock, you might have missed the latest major development in Israel’s barbaric crimes against the Palestinian people and its supporters. A flotilla of boats with unarmed pro-Palestinian peace activists carrying dangerous and abhorrent things such as food, medical supplies and toys were hijacked in act of piracy by Israeli Navy and Military where at least 19 have been massacred and even more injured.

The latest crime needs to be outrightly condemned as yet another barbarous and indefensible action from the Israeli state, hell-bent on doing anything it can to stop support for people they want to starve in the open air prison that is Gaza. This is an outrageous attack on unarmed civilians and the media coverage, whilst trying to find any glimmer of something to defend the Israelis with, can’t help but reveal the callous actions the Zionist state have undertaken that will continue to drive support for the apartheid state away.

But I am not able to express everything as well as other bloggers closer to the action or on top of developments as they happen.

Antony Loewenstein is a master at posting frequent snippets from the world’s media on the Israel/Palestine issue and is covering the latest attack on the flotilla.

Lenin’s Tomb has also posted frequently and will no doubt cover the solidarity actions in Britain today.

From the Arab world, The Angry Arab News Service will cover the developments with snippets, wit and graphic imagery.

From En Passant, John Passant says “we are all Palestinians now.”

From Harpymarx:

And the BBC, so much for unbiased and impartiality, interviews former Israeli commandos who spout the line along with a naval officer who defends storming the flotilla (why did they have to storm it in the first place? Nothing whatsoever about the mission of the flotilla, or the war crimes and acts of terrorism committed against the Palestinians in Gaza. Instead Mark Thompson (Director-General) capitulates time and time again to the pro-Zionist lobby.

I will add more tomorrow as news develops and bloggers get a chance to catch up to the media.

Tomorrow there are protests and speak outs all over Australian capital cities to show solidarity with the Palestinians and the activists attacked. RSVP to the Facebook event and invite your friends.

Atwood refuses to take a stand and accepts apartheid prize

Some readers may remember that a little over a month ago, I wrote an article on Palestinian students issuing a plea to novelist Margaret Atwood to join the cultural boycott of Israel and show solidarity with the Palestinians by rejecting the Dan David Prize from Tel Aviv University.

Margaret AtwoodBut I was disappointed to learn that Atwood had rejected calls to join the boycott, accepted the award alongside Amitav Ghosh, and has left me to conclude that her reputation as a left-wing novelist on the right side of social justice issues is just a hollow façade that she is unwilling to back up with action.

Like when Japanese novelist Haruki Murakami broke the boycott last year, I was eager to read the acceptance speech to see how they justified accepting a prize from an apartheid regime, but also like Murakami, Atwood and Ghosh responded with a vague analogy to writers and a perverse lie that they and Israel were the victims of censorship.

To portray the cultural boycott as censorship is inherently misleading, especially in regards to a state that has no limits to the support they receive from world powers and media giants. It also ignores the fact that the cultural boycott is chiefly about showing solidarity with Palestinians who are the real victims of censorship as a result of discriminatory apartheid laws, including the attempted shut down of last year’s Palestinian Festival of Literature among other things that affect the lives of all Palestinians, not just writers.

They also claimed that “It is a prize founded by a private individual, and administered by its own office located at Tel Aviv University. Despite what we have been told by its attackers, it is not one and the same as the State of Israel.”

I disagree with Atwood’s assertion that we should not be boycotting individuals, but even by her own logic, the Dan David Prize and Tel Aviv University are intimately tied up with the barbarous state of Israel and its heinous crimes.

2009 War on GazaDan David was a committed Zionist, a member of the Zionist Youth Movement and organised emigration to Israel as part of pushing the Palestinians off their land. Also, Tel Aviv University is responsible for funding numerous defence and military projects that have been directly used to murder Palestinians.

Writers often hide messages beneath the murky depths of fiction, weaving themes and statements behind metaphors but a speech responding to such concrete political arguments really is not the time for such things – unless of course you want to dodge the issue.

The question really does come down to, are you willing to take a side and take a stand? Atwood and Ghosh do neither choosing remain at best ambivalent on a serious political question and at worst, assisting Israel in their PR campaign to use the arts and other social issues to co-opt socially conscious figures into providing cover for the state’s war crimes.

I don’t think there’s something inherent in writers that makes them more progressive, socially conscious or willing to take a stand. Atwood wondered why the writers receiving the Dan David Prize were singled out and not the other figures. It’s not because of this or because they’re easy targets.

In particular regards to Atwood, she is seen as a progressive figure in literature, was an outspoken critic of South African apartheid and at least I considered her to be someone who would back up words with actions, put aside a mere prize in order to stand by a principle.

She even said: “I sympathize with the very bad conditions the people of Gaza are living through due to the blockade, the military actions, and the Egyptian and Israeli walls.”

Apartheid WallA Palestinian student replied: “We are not asking for sympathy! We want solidarity…You are either with justice or with injustice. There is no neutral zone.”

Her unwillingness to show that solidarity leaves her progressive words sitting now as a fraudulent and hollow shell.

As a political writer, I consider it incredibly important to actually stand up for what I believe in, to not just talk about it. This sometimes means sacrificing what is good for yourself, for the greater good, to be on the right side and to show solidarity with others in need of solidarity.

Atwood, was it that half a million dollars in prize money that made you accept the prize? Was it the fact that you don’t really support the Palestinians? Or was it because you were too cowed by the powers that be to stick your neck out and stand by the principles I thought you had?

Either way, shame Atwood, shame.

Second and third photos from PalestineThinkTank.com

Gaza students call on Margaret Atwood to boycott Israel

Yesterday afternoon, an article by myself appeared on the website of Socialist Alternative:

Gaza students call on Margaret Atwood to boycott Israel
Benjamin Solah 07 April 2010

The Palestinian Students’ Campaign for the Academic Boycott of Israel has issued an open letter to novelist Margaret Atwood. The letter asks her to support the cultural boycott of Israel by refusing the Dan David prize for literature from Tel Aviv University.

Click here to read the full text

I wrote this after seeing the open letter appear on Electronic Intifada. Calls on (particularly left-wing) writers are significant in the campaign against the apartheid state of Israel, both for and against. For Atwood to reject the prize would be a victory for us, but for Atwood to reject our calls and break the boycott would a betrayal. I think Israel is making a point of targeting certain figures to break the boycott such as Bono, Leonard Cohen, and now Margaret Atwood.

One other thing that I found interested was when doing a search on Twitter for who had sent messages to Margaret Atwood, I found a lot of people had forwarded the original open letter to her including pleas to not break the boycott.

Israel/Palestine: More Settlements Confirm Again Israel Doesn't Want Peace

The WallOnce again, Israel has declared they’re going to build more illegal settlements in the West Bank. Once again, the United States has come out in mock condemnation. And once again, there will be no consequences for Israel’s actions. Does anyone honestly think the United States will do anything like withhold military funding?

You really have to ask how people can think Israel is interested in peace. They’ve proven time and time again that they’re not committed to the peace process, but it’s always the Palestinians that get accused of that. The peace process is held up as this unrealisable promise that keeps Palestinians compliant and passive.

Second IntifadaThe significant thing about the latest announcement is that they’ve locked down the West Bank for fear of unrest. Clearly, there are people in the West Bank sick of these empty promises and dead ends. The fact that al-Aqsa mosque has also been locked down is another significant move, given Ariel Sharon’s visit to the holy site in 2000 sparked the second intifada, the last major uprising of the Palestinians.

Does this offer signals that unrest is on the horizon?

Melbourne supporters of the Palestinians will be protesting this Friday, the 19th, at 6pm at the State Library to demand that the Australian government break ties with apartheid Israel. Click here for the Facebook event.

On the Mossad Passport Scandal

It’s been revealed this morning that some of the Israeli Mossad agents that are alleged to have gone to Dubai to assassinate a senior Hamas leader may have used Australian passports, either stolen or forged.

I awoke to Kevin Rudd’s stern and serious face on ABC News this morning. It was a bit perplexing actually.

Of course he prefaced all of his comments with, “I say this is a friend of Israel.” And he went on to state that this was a serious issue, not something to be put aside.

Is he being honest or is this grandstanding like when Obama says he’s serious about freezing settlements in West Bank?

States do take their official documents like passports seriously, but it seems obvious to me that intelligence agencies would do dodgy things like this all the time. Suppose it’s just anger at being caught.

Someone rightly pointed out on Twitter this morning that if this was Iran, we’d quite likely be at war already.

I honestly don’t know what’s at play here. But I do know that this isn’t likely to change Australia’s overall unwavering support for the apartheid state.

Update: Foreign Minister Stephen Smith has been quoted in an ABC News article as saying: “I’ve made it crystal clear to the ambassador that if the results of that investigation cause us to come to the conclusion that the abuse of Australian passports was in any way sponsored or condoned by Israeli officials, then Australia would not regard that as the act of a friend.”

These are pretty strong words. I find them surprising, but the stronger the Australian government makes their feelings known, the more I feel like it is a giant fraud. Breaking with Israel over such a thing would be contrary to the interests of Australian capitalism, bringing into the question the alliance with the United States. This is just too much to lose for them.